4.8 Article

Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Porous Carbon Matrix Coated on Carbon Fibers: An Ultrastable Cathode for Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201601363

关键词

3D networked porous carbon matrix; cathodes; cycling stability; solid-electrolyte interface; V2O5 nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672044, 51302035, 21171035, 51372213]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [16PJ1400200]
  3. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program
  4. Science and Technology Commission of the Shanghai Municipality [13ZR1451200]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured V2O5 is emerging as a new cathode material for lithium ion batteries for its distinctly high theoretic capacity over the current commercial cathodes. The main challenges associated with nanostructured V2O5 cathodes are structural degradation, instability of the solid-electrolyte interface layer, and poor electron conductance, which lead to low capacity and rapid decay of cyclic stability. Here, a novel composite structure of V2O5 nanoparticles encapsulated in 3D networked porous carbon matrix coated on carbon fibers (V2O5/3DC-CFs) is reported that effectively addresses the mentioned problems. Remarkably, the V2O5/3DC-CF electrode exhibits excellent overall lithium-storage performance, including high Coulombic efficiency, excellent specific capacity, outstanding cycling stability and rate property. A reversible capacity of approximate to 183 mA h g(-1) is obtained at a high current density of 10 C, and the battery retains 185 mA h g(-1) after 5000 cycles, which shows the best cycling stability reported to date among all reported cathodes of lithium ion batteries as per the knowledge. The outstanding overall properties of the V2O5/3DC-CF composite make it a promising cathode material of lithium ion batteries for the power-intensive energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据