4.0 Article

Fast Optimization of LiMgMnOx/La2O3 Catalysts for the Oxidative Coupling of Methane

期刊

ACS COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 15-24

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscombsci.6b00108

关键词

high-throughput; oxidative coupling of methane; multidimensional group testing; inkjet printing

资金

  1. Shell Global Solutions International B.V. [PT37712]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21271153, 21373181, 21222307, U1402233]
  3. Major Research Plan Of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91545113]
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [131015]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014XZZX003-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of efficient catalyst for oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) reaction represents a grand challenge in direct conversion of methane into other useful products. Here, we reported that a newly developed combinatorial approach can be used for ultrafast optimization of La2O3-based multicomponent metal oxide catalysts in OCM reaction. This new approach integrated inkjet printing assisted synthesis (IJP-A) with multidimensional group testing, strategy (m-GT) tactfully takes the place of conventionally high-throughput synthesis-and-screen experiment. Just within a week, 2048 formulated LiMgMnOxLa2O3 catalysts in a 64.8.8.8.8 = 262 144 compositional space were fabricated by IJP-A in a four-round synthesis-and-screen process, and an optimized formulation has been successfully identified through only 4.8 = 32 times of tests via m-GT screening strategy. The screening process identifies the most promising ternary composition region is Li0-0.48Mg0-6.54Mn0-0.62-La100Ox with an external C-2 yield of 10.87% at 700 degrees C. The yield of C-2 is two times as high as the pure nano-La2O3. The good performance of the optimized catalyst formulation has been validated by the manual preparation, which further prove the effectiveness of the new combinatorial methodology in fast discovery of heterogeneous catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据