4.8 Article

Influence of Acidic (H3PO4) and Alkaline (NaOH) Additives on the Catalytic Reductive Fractionation of Lignocellulose

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 2055-2066

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02906

关键词

lignocellulose; biorefinery; lignin chemistry; heterogeneous catalysis; hydrogenolysis; fractionation

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen)
  2. KU Leuven
  3. agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen)
  4. IWT-SBO project ARBOREF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reductive catalytic fractionation of lignocellulose is a promising lignin-first biorefinery strategy wherein lignin is solvolytically extracted from the cell wall matrix and simultaneously disassembled, resulting in a stable lignin oil and a solid carbohydrate-rich residue. Herein, we report on the different influence of acidic (H3PO4) and alkaline (NaOH) additives on the Pd/C-catalyzed reductive processing of poplar wood in methanol (MeOH). It was found that the addition of small quantities of H3PO4 results in three rather than two product streams, since under acidic conditions both delignification and alcoholysis of hemicellulose are promoted, leaving behind a cellulose-rich pulp. The simultaneous acid-catalyzed fractionation of the carbohydrates into separate cellulose and hemicellulose streams provides opportunities for more efficient downstream conversion, as processing parameters can be tailored to the needs of both streams. Alkaline conditions, on the other hand, also enhance delignification, but additionally cause (0 the formation of lignin products other than those obtained under neutral and acidic conditions, (ii) a hampered degree of lignin depolymerization, and (iii) substantial loss of cellulose from the pulp. Further on, a modified process descriptor (LFFE: lignin first fractionation efficiency) was applied to evaluate the fractionation efficiency of lignocellulose in its three major constituents. According to this new efficiency measure, mildly acidic conditions performed best.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据