4.8 Review

Recent Advances in the Catalytic Synthesis of α-Ketoamides

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 4920-4945

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01116

关键词

alpha-ketoamides; catalysis; amino dicarbonylation; oxidative amidation; chemoselectivity

资金

  1. North Dakota State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

alpha-Ketoamides and their derivatives are key constituents of natural products, biologically relevant molecules, drug and drug candidates, and functional materials. Further, they are versatile and valuable intermediates and synthons in a number of functional group transformations and total syntheses. In recent years tremendous growth has been realized in the development of synthetic methods for a-ketoamide preparation and their applications in synthetic and medicinal chemistry. Among the various catalytic methods of alpha-ketoamide formation, two approaches, namely double aminocarbonylation and oxidative amidation, have received much more attention and have been greatly studied because of the ready availability of the starting materials, use of carbon monoxide (CO) as a direct source of carbonyl functionalities, and use of molecular oxygen (O-2) or air as a green terminal oxidant and/or reactants. Catalyzed alpha-ketoamide formation can be roughly classified into metal- and nonmetal-catalyzed processes. In the context of metal catalysis, most reactions involving metals are performed using palladium (Pd) and copper (Cu); however, other metals such as gold (Au), silver (Ag), and iron (Fe) based catalysts have also been investigated to some extent. On the other hand, nonmetal-catalyzed alpha-ketoamide syntheses are mainly restricted to iodine-based catalysts in the presence or absence of other promoters. Our objective in this review is to highlight the important research endeavors related to catalytic alpha-ketoamide synthesis, which include the trends in the catalytic synthesis of alpha-ketoamides, new breakthroughs, and recent advances up to March 2016.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据