4.8 Article

The Mechanism of Acceptorless Amine Double Dehydrogenation by N,N,N-Amide Ruthenium(II) Hydrides: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 4799-4813

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01465

关键词

dehydrogenation; primary amines; nitriles; ruthenium; reaction mechanism; pincer ligand

资金

  1. University of Michigan Department of Chemistry
  2. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [53760-DN13]
  3. National Science Foundation [1551994]
  4. Raman Center for Atomic, Molecular and Optical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1551994] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Chemistry [1551994] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed mechanistic analysis of the acceptorless double dehydrogenation of primary amines to form nitriles by HRu(bMepi)(PPh3)(2) (1, bMepi = 1,3-bis(6'-methyl-2'-pyridylimino)isoindolate) is presented. The presence of the ortho-CH3 substituents on bMepi is critical for amine dehydrogenation, and no catalysis was observed with HRu(bpi)(PPh3)(2) (1-bpi, bpi = 1,3-bis(2'-pyridylimino)isoindolate). Outer-sphere, inner-sphere, and hemilabile pathways were evaluated through ligand substitution and kinetic studies, catalyst modifications, and computational analysis. We propose an inner-sphere mechanism in which a Ru-hydride is protonated by coordinated amine followed by H-2 release, which forms a Ru-amido intermediate. The stability of Ru-amido species was evaluated through NBO, MM, and NCI analyses, revealing steric pressure as well as weak noncovalent interactions between the coordinated amido nitrogen atom and the ortho-alkyl substituents, and these interactions impact the overall thermodynamic profile for amine dehydrogenation by 1. Finally, the preference for double dehydrogenation over the transamination reaction is attributed to a high binding constant of the imine intermediate and fast kinetics of a second dehydrogenation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据