4.8 Article

DFT Insights into the Competitive Adsorption of Sulfur- and Nitrogen-Containing Compounds and Hydrocarbons on Co-Promoted Molybdenum Sulfide Catalysts

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 2904-2917

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00058

关键词

hydrodesulfurization; CoMoS; organonitrogen inhibition; density functional theory; van der Waals interaction

资金

  1. BP Products North America Inc.
  2. Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences [DE-FG02-05ER15731]
  3. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research at PNNL
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. UW-Madison
  6. Advanced Computing Initiative
  7. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  8. Wisconsin Institute for Discovery
  9. National Science Foundation
  10. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption of 20 nitrogen-/sulfur-containing and hydrocarbon compounds on the sulfur edge of cobalt promoted molybdenum sulfide (CoMoS) catalyst was studied using density functional theory, accounting for van der Waals interactions, to elicit comparative structure property trends across different classes of molecules relevant to hydrotreating. Unhindered organosulfur compounds preferentially adsorb on a CUS-like site formed by the dimerization of two neighboring sulfur atoms on the edge to create a vacancy. Nitrogen-containing compounds and 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene, however, prefer the brim sites. Binding energy trends indicate that nitrogen containing compounds will inhibit hydrodesulfurization on the brim sites and, relatively weakly, on the CUS-like sites. Edge vacancies are, therefore, likely to be essential for hydrodesulfurization of unhindered organosulfur compounds. Further, van der Waals forces contribute significantly to the binding energy of compounds (up to 1.0 eV for large compounds such as alkyl-substituted acridines) on CoMoS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据