4.8 Article

Tuning Catalytic Selectivity at the Mesoscale via Interparticle Interactions

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 1075-1080

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02202

关键词

copper; nanoparticles; electrocatalysis; CO2 electroreduction; methane; CO

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences from the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER15995]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF CHE-1213182]
  3. Cluster of Excellence RESOLV at RUB - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC 1069]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) under the Priority Program 1613 Regeneratively Formed Fuels by Water Splitting [STR 596/3-1]
  5. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fur Bildung and Forschung, BMBF) [03SF0523 - CO2EKAT]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1213182] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-08ER15995] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selectivity of heterogeneously catalyzed chemical reactions is well-known to be dependent on nanoscale determinants, such as surface atomic geometry and composition. However, principles to control the selectivity of nanoparticle (NP) catalysts by means of mesoscopic descriptors, such as the interparticle distance, have remained largely unexplored. We used well-defined copper catalysts to deconvolute the effect of NP size and distance on product selectivity during CO2 electroreduction. Corroborated by reaction-diffusion modeling, our results reveal that mesoscale phenomena such as interparticle reactant diffusion and readsorption of intermediates play a defining role in product selectivity. More importantly, this study uncovers general principles of tailoring NP activity and selectivity by carefully engineering size and distance. These principles provide guidance for the rational design of mesoscopic catalyst architectures in order to enhance the production of desired reaction products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据