4.8 Article

On the Preferred Active Sites of Promoted MoS2 for Hydrodesulfurization with Minimal Organonitrogen Inhibition

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 501-509

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02735

关键词

promoted molybdenum sulfide; hydrodesulfurization; nitrogen inhibition; binding energy descriptors; density functional theory; active site identification

资金

  1. Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences [DE-FG02-05ER15731]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research located at PNNL
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. UW-Madison
  5. Advanced Computing Initiative
  6. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  7. Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery
  8. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrodesulfurization is a process to produce ultralow-sulfur diesel fuel. Although promoted molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) catalysts have been used industrially for several decades, the active site requirements for selective hydrodesulfurization of organosulfur compounds with minimal inhibition by organonitrogen constituents of a real gasoil feed has not been resolved. Using molecular binding energy descriptors derived from plane wave density functional theory calculations for comparative adsorption of organosulfur and organonitrogen compounds, we analyzed more than 20 potential sites on unpromoted and Ni- and Co-promoted MoS2. We find that hydrogen sulfide and ammonia are simple descriptors of adsorption of sterically unhindered organosulfur and organonitrogen compounds such as dibenzothiophene and acridine, respectively. Further, organonitrogen compounds in gasoil bind more strongly than organosulfur compounds on all sites except on sites with exposed metal atoms on the corner and sulfur edges of promoted MoS2. Consequently, these sites are proposed as required for maximum-hydrodesulfurization minimum-inhibition catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据