4.8 Article

Reversibility Iteration Method for Understanding Reaction Networks and for Solving Microkinetics in Heterogeneous Catalysis

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 7078-7087

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02405

关键词

microkinetics; heterogeneous catalysis; reversibility iteration method; turnover frequency; catalytic mechanism; catalysis design

资金

  1. 973 Program [2013CB933201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21333003, 21303052]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [14QA1401100]
  4. ChenGuang project [13CG24]
  5. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solving microkinetics of catalytic systems, which bridges microscopic processes and macroscopic reaction rates, is currently vital for understanding catalysis in silica. However, traditional microkinetic solvers possess several drawbacks that make the process slow and unreliable for complicated catalytic systems. In this paper, a new approach, the so-called reversibility iteration method (RIM), is developed to solve microkinetics for catalytic systems. Using the chemical potential notation we previously proposed to simplify the kinetic framework, the catalytic systems can be analytically illustrated to be logically equivalent to the electric circuit, and the reaction rate and coverage can be calculated by updating the values of reversibilities. Compared to the traditional modified Newton iteration method (NIM), our method is not sensitive to the initial guess of the solution and typically requires fewer iteration steps. Moreover, the method does not require arbitrary-precision arithmetic and has a higher probability of successfully solving the system. These features make it similar to 1000 times faster than the modified Newton iteration method for the systems we tested. Moreover, the derived concept and the mathematical framework presented in this work may provide new insight into catalytic reaction networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据