4.8 Article

Evolution and Enabling Capabilities of Spatially Resolved Techniques for the Characterization of Heterogeneously Catalyzed Reactions

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 1356-1381

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02602

关键词

spatial resolution; catalyst characterization; monoliths; packed beds; electromagnetic probes; physical probes

资金

  1. EPSRC UK [EP/F026390/1, EP/G02152X/1, EP/K014714/1]
  2. Johnson Matthey under a CASE award
  3. Department of Employment and Learning NI
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014706/1, EP/F026390/1, EP/K014714/1, 1495367, EP/K014854/1, EP/G02152X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/K014714/1, EP/G02152X/1, EP/K014854/1, EP/K014706/1, EP/F026390/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development and optimization of catalysts and catalytic processes requires knowledge of reaction kinetics and mechanisms. In traditional catalyst kinetic characterization, the gas composition is known at the inlet, and the exit flow is measured to determine changes in concentration. As such, the progression of the chemistry within the catalyst is not known. Technological advances in electromagnetic and physical probes have made visualizing the evolution of the chemistry within catalyst samples a reality, as part of a methodology commonly known as spatial resolution. Herein, we discuss and evaluate the development of spatially resolved techniques, including the evolutions and achievements of this growing area of catalytic research. The impact of such techniques is discussed in terms of the invasiveness of physical probes on catalytic systems, as well as how experimentally obtained spatial profiles can be used in conjunction with kinetic modeling. Furthermore, some aims and aspirations for further evolution of spatially resolved techniques are considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据