4.8 Article

Enhanced Lithium-Oxygen Battery Performances with Pt Subnanocluster Decorated N-Doped Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Cathodes

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 7088-7097

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01016

关键词

electrocatalysis; metal-oxygen batteries; bifunctional catalysts; single-walled carbon nanotubes; nanoclusters

资金

  1. Wayne State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Achieving dramatic improvement in long-term cycling performance in Li-O-2 batteries continues to remain a challenge, which is imperative for turning their alluring promise into reality. Developing a bifunctional cathode material capable of reducing overpotentials and enhancing the long-term cycling performances holds the key. Herein, bifunctional cathodes for Li-O-2 batteries were prepared by electrodeposited Pt subnanoclusters on pristine as well as nitrogen-doped single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) using rotating disk electrode voltammetry techniques. Diffraction, microscopic, and spectroscopic techniques were used to characterize the prepared materials, and the phase purity of the materials was confirmed. Microscopic analysis depicted a fine dispersion of nm Pt nanoclusters on single-walled carbon nanotubes. Rotating disk electrode voltammetry measurements indicated low overpotentials as well as high catalytic ORR/OER activities with Pt nanocluster decorated SWCNTs in comparison to Pt-free SWCNTs. Among the investigated cathodes, Pt/N-SWCNTs exhibited high discharge capacities of 7685 and 5907 mAh/g at 100 and 500 mA/g, respectively, and also good capacity retention. Moreover, a stable capacity of 3000 mAh/g with 100% Coulombic efficiency at 500 niA/g was demonstrated under repeated cycling conditions. On the basis of the ex situ Raman spectroscopic studies, the high Li-O-2 battery performance of the Pt/N-SWCNT cathode was attributed to the high decomposition activity of Li2O2 and negligible amount of Li2O2 accumulated on the electrode surface during cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据