4.8 Article

Two-dimensional antimonene single crystals grown by van der Waals epitaxy

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13352

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB931702]
  2. NSFC [51572128, 51502140, 21403109]
  3. NSFC-RGC [5151101197]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20140769, BK20150761]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30916015106]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. PAPD of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unlike the unstable black phosphorous, another two-dimensional group-VA material, antimonene, was recently predicted to exhibit good stability and remarkable physical properties. However, the synthesis of high-quality monolayer or few-layer antimonenes, sparsely reported, has greatly hindered the development of this new field. Here, we report the van der Waals epitaxy growth of few-layer antimonene monocrystalline polygons, their atomical microstructure and stability in ambient condition. The high-quality, few-layer antimonene monocrystalline polygons can be synthesized on various substrates, including flexible ones, via van der Waals epitaxy growth. Raman spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy reveal that the obtained antimonene polygons have buckled rhombohedral atomic structure, consistent with the theoretically predicted most stable beta-phase allotrope. The very high stability of antimonenes was observed after aging in air for 30 days. First-principle and molecular dynamics simulation results confirmed that compared with phosphorene, antimonene is less likely to be oxidized and possesses higher thermodynamic stability in oxygen atmosphere at room temperature. Moreover, antimonene polygons show high electrical conductivity up to 10(4)Sm(-1) and good optical transparency in the visible light range, promising in transparent conductive electrode applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据