4.8 Article

Caloric restriction blocks neuropathology and motor deficits in Machado-Joseph disease mouse models through SIRT1 pathway

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11445

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER through the Competitive Factors Operational Program-COMPETE [CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002002]
  2. National Funds (PIDDAC), Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Joint call for European Research Project on Rare Diseases [UID/NEU/04539/2013, E-Rare4/0003/2012]
  3. French Muscular Dystrophy Association (AFM)
  4. National Ataxia Foundation (NAF)
  5. Richard Chin and Lily Lock Machado-Joseph disease Research Fund
  6. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/87404/2012, SFRH/BD/74993/2010, SRFH/BD/87048/2012]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/87404/2012, E-Rare4/0003/2012, SFRH/BD/74993/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by an abnormal expansion of the CAG triplet in the ATXN3 gene, translating into a polyglutamine tract within the ataxin-3 protein. The available treatments only ameliorate symptomatology and do not block disease progression. In this study we find that caloric restriction dramatically rescues the motor incoordination, imbalance and the associated neuropathology in transgenic MJD mice. We further show that caloric restriction rescues SIRT1 levels in transgenic MJD mice, whereas silencing SIRT1 is sufficient to prevent the beneficial effects on MJD pathology. In addition, the re-establishment of SIRT1 levels in MJD mouse model, through the gene delivery approach, significantly ameliorates neuropathology, reducing neuroinflammation and activating autophagy. Furthermore, the pharmacological activation of SIRT1 with resveratrol significantly reduces motor incoordination of MJD mice. The pharmacological SIRT1 activation could provide important benefits to treat MJD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据