4.8 Article

Multifunctional hydrogel nano-probes for atomic force microscopy

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11566

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commercializations Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes (COMPA) [2015K000127]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2013R1A1A1076080, NRF-2014R1A2A1A11053283]
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore [NRF-NRFF2011-01, NRF-CRP10-2012-07]
  4. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/CBRG/0005/2012]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A2A1A11053283, 2013R1A1A1076080, 22A20152813151] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the invention of the atomic force microscope (AFM) three decades ago, there have been numerous advances in its measurement capabilities. Curiously, throughout these developments, the fundamental nature of the force-sensing probe-the key actuating element-has remained largely unchanged. It is produced by long-established microfabrication etching strategies and typically composed of silicon-based materials. Here, we report a new class of photopolymerizable hydrogel nano-probes that are produced by bottom-up fabrication with compressible replica moulding. The hydrogel probes demonstrate excellent capabilities for AFM imaging and force measurement applications while enabling programmable, multifunctional capabilities based on compositionally adjustable mechanical properties and facile encapsulation of various nanomaterials. Taken together, the simple, fast and affordable manufacturing route and multifunctional capabilities of hydrogel AFM nano-probes highlight the potential of soft matter mechanical transducers in nanotechnology applications. The fabrication scheme can also be readily utilized to prepare hydrogel cantilevers, including in parallel arrays, for nanomechanical sensor devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据