4.8 Article

Gas-solid interfacial modification of oxygen activity in layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12108

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMTE from Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA09010101]
  2. CAS [174433KYSB20150047]
  3. Department of Energy, USA (CAS-DOE) [174433KYSB20150047]
  4. Ningbo Science and Technology Innovation Team [2012B82001]
  5. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 7073923]
  6. U.S. DOE, Office of Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  7. office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), the Office of Science of the U.S. DOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lattice oxygen can play an intriguing role in electrochemical processes, not only maintaining structural stability, but also influencing electron and ion transport properties in high-capacity oxide cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Here, we report the design of a gas-solid interface reaction to achieve delicate control of oxygen activity through uniformly creating oxygen vacancies without affecting structural integrity of Li-rich layered oxides. Theoretical calculations and experimental characterizations demonstrate that oxygen vacancies provide a favourable ionic diffusion environment in the bulk and significantly suppress gas release from the surface. The target material is achievable in delivering a discharge capacity as high as 301 mAhg(-1) with initial Coulombic efficiency of 93.2%. After 100 cycles, a reversible capacity of 300 mAhg(-1) still remains without any obvious decay in voltage. This study sheds light on the comprehensive design and control of oxygen activity in transition-metal-oxide systems for next-generation Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据