4.8 Article

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor controls cyclin O to promote epithelial multiciliogenesis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12652

关键词

-

资金

  1. Francis Crick Institute from Cancer Research UK [FC001206, FC001159, FC001157]
  2. UK Medical Research Council [FC001206, FC001159, FC001157]
  3. Wellcome Trust [FC001206, FC001159, FC001157]
  4. MRC grant [U117597139]
  5. Wellcome Investigator Grant
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  7. Biological Research Facility
  8. Advanced Sequencing Facility
  9. Electron Microscopy Facility
  10. MRC [MC_U117597139, MC_U117597140] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_U117597140, MC_U117597139] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. The Francis Crick Institute [10160, 10157, 10159, 10206] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelia function as barriers against environmental insults and express the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). However, AhR function in these tissues is unknown. Here we show that AhR regulates multiciliogenesis in both murine airway epithelia and in Xenopus laevis epidermis. In air-exposed airway epithelia, induction of factors required for multiciliogenesis, including cyclin O (Ccno) and Multicilin (Mcidas), is AhR dependent, and air exposure induces AhR binding to the Ccno promoter. Submersion and hypoxic conditions impede AhR-dependent Ccno induction. This is mediated by the persistence of Notch signalling, as Notch blockade renders multiciliogenesis and Ccno induction by AhR independent from air exposure. In contrast to Ccno induction, air exposure does not induce the canonical AhR target cytochrome P450 1a1 (Cyp1a1). Inversely, exposure to AhR ligands induces Cyp1a1 but not Ccno and impeded ciliogenesis. These data indicate that AhR involvement in detoxification of environmental pollutants may impede its physiological role, resulting in respiratory pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据