4.8 Article

Gpr176 is a Gz-linked orphan G-protein-coupled receptor that sets the pace of circadian behaviour

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10583

关键词

-

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Kobayashi International Scholarship Foundation
  5. Senri Life Science Foundation
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  7. Inoue Foundation for Science
  8. Brain Science Foundation
  9. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  10. Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science
  11. Medical Research Council, UK
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_U105170643] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. MRC [MC_U105170643] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K15416, 15H05933, 15K21744, 15H01843, 26293013] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) participate in a broad range of physiological functions. A priority for fundamental and clinical research, therefore, is to decipher the function of over 140 remaining orphan GPCRs. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the brain's circadian pacemaker, governs daily rhythms in behaviour and physiology. Here we launch the SCN orphan GPCR project to (i) search for murine orphan GPCRs with enriched expression in the SCN, (ii) generate mutant animals deficient in candidate GPCRs, and (iii) analyse the impact on circadian rhythms. We thereby identify Gpr176 as an SCN-enriched orphan GPCR that sets the pace of circadian behaviour. Gpr176 is expressed in a circadian manner by SCN neurons, and molecular characterization reveals that it represses cAMP signalling in an agonist-independent manner. Gpr176 acts independently of, and in parallel to, the Vipr2 GPCR, not through the canonical Gi, but via the unique G-protein subclass Gz.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据