4.8 Article

Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12083

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation MacroSystems Biology program [NSF EF-1065844]
  2. Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of Oklahoma
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality at the Tsinghua University
  4. National Science Foundation of China [41430856]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31540071]
  6. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB15010302]
  7. CAS 100 talent program
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [1546686] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Emerging Frontiers
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1065836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate warming is increasingly leading to marked changes in plant and animal biodiversity, but it remains unclear how temperatures affect microbial biodiversity, particularly in terrestrial soils. Here we show that, in accordance with metabolic theory of ecology, taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of soil bacteria, fungi and nitrogen fixers are all better predicted by variation in environmental temperature than pH. However, the rates of diversity turnover across the global temperature gradients are substantially lower than those recorded for trees and animals, suggesting that the diversity of plant, animal and soil microbial communities show differential responses to climate change. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the diversity of different microbial groups has significantly lower rates of turnover across temperature gradients than other major taxa, which has important implications for assessing the effects of human-caused changes in climate, land use and other factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据