4.4 Article

N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E expression is associated with poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 4659-4664

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5283

关键词

overall survival; prognosis; N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E; lung adenocarcinoma; disease-free survival

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372287]
  2. Liaoning Province Science and Technology Key Project [2012225016]
  3. Shenyang City Science and Technology Key Project [F12-193-9-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality rates. To date, no suitable molecular diagnostic tool to predict disease recurrence and metastasis has been identified. The current study aimed to evaluate the potential of N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E (CPE Delta N) to predict the recurrence and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. Western blotting revealed the co-expression of CPE and CPE Delta N in the surgically collected pathological and pericarcinoma tissues tissues of 62.1% (59/95) lung adenocarcinoma patients. The full length CPE protein was predominantly expressed in pericarcinoma tissues and CPE Delta N expression was identified in the pericarcinoma normal tissues of only 5.26% (5/95) patients. The 3-year postoperative recurrence and metastasis rates were significantly higher in patients with positive CPE Delta N expression than in patients with negative CPE Delta N expression (P=0.009). Furthermore, the overall survival rate of patients with predominant nuclear CPE expression was lower than that of patients with predominant cytoplasmic CPE expression (46.3 vs. 64.7%); however, no statistically significant difference was identified (P=0.125). Thus, the results of the current study indicated that CPE Delta N may present a novel molecular biomarker for predicting recurrence and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma, which may aid with stratifying patients by risk and thus, may facilitate individualized therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据