4.4 Article

Effects of nano tantalum implants on inducing osteoblast proliferation and differentiation

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 3541-3544

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3801

关键词

nano tantalum implants; osteoblast; proliferation differentiation; alkaline phosphatase; collagen type I; osteocalcin

资金

  1. Scientific Research Project for Middle-aged and Young Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2013SW041]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81271105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we examined the effects of nano tantalum (Ta) dental implants on inducing osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. The MG-63 osteoblasts were divided into 3 groups after recovery, passage and storage: i) Osteoblast culturing group (control group); ii) osteoblast and titanium (Ti) implant co-culturing group (Ti group); and iii) osteoblast and Ta implant co-culturing group (Ta group). After 7 days, a scanning electron microscope was used to observe the growth status., number and morphological changes of the cells on the surfaces of the materials. An MTT assay was used to detect cell proliferation after culturing for 1, 3 and 7 days. ELISA assay was used to detect the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after 1, 3 and 7 days. Western blot analysis was used to detect the expression levels of collagen type I (Col-1) and osteocalcin after 1, 3 and 7 days. There was significant cell spreading on the surfaces of Ti and of Ta after 7 days, flat and with many pseudopodia. Additionally, there were more cell components in the Ta group. Concurrently, cell proliferation in the Ti and Ta groups increased. There was also an increase in the level of ALP and the expression level of Col-1 over time. The indexes of the Ta group were more apparent than those of the Ti group at each time-point, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, compared with Ti implants, Ta implants induced more osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据