4.2 Article

Good Cell Culture Practice for Stem Cells and Stem-Cell-Derived Models

期刊

出版社

SPEKTRUM AKADEMISCHER VERLAG-SPRINGER-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.14573/altex.1607121

关键词

Good Cell Culture Practices; in vitro methods; alternatives to animals; induced pluripotent stem cells

资金

  1. EU-ToxRisk Project [681002]
  2. German BMBF grant NeuriTox
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development grants [15mk0104053h0101, 16mk0104027j0002]
  4. MRC [MR/L01324X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/L01324X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [ZIATR000039] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293056] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first guidance on Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP) dates back to 2005. This document expands this to include aspects of quality assurance for in vitro cell culture focusing on the increasingly diverse cell types and culture formats used in research, product development, testing and manufacture of biotechnology products and cell-based medicines. It provides a set of basic principles of best practice that can be used in training new personnel, reviewing and improving local procedures, and helping to assure standard practices and conditions for the comparison of data between laboratories and experimentation performed at different times. This includes recommendations for the documentation and reporting of culture conditions. It is intended as guidance to facilitate the generation of reliable data from cell culture systems, and is not intended to conflict with local or higher level legislation or regulatory requirements. It may not be possible to meet all recommendations in this guidance for practical, legal or other reasons. However, when it is necessary to divert from the principles of GCCP, the risk of decreasing the quality of work and the safety of laboratory staff should be addressed and any conclusions or alternative approaches justified. This workshop report is considered a first step toward a revised GCCP 2.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据