4.3 Article

Bimatoprost, latanoprost, and tafluprost induce differential expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases

期刊

BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0202-8

关键词

Human non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cells; Matrix metalloproteinases; Prostaglandin analog; Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT) [S1101027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Differences in the increase in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and decrease in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) activity may contribute to the different characteristics observed clinically on decreased intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the expression profiles of MMPs and TIMPs induced by the prostaglandin analogs bimatoprost, latanoprost, and tafluprost in human non-pigmented ciliary epithelial cells (HNPCECs). Methods: HNPCECs were cultured for 24 In with 0, 10, 100, or 1000 mu M of the free acid forms of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and tafluprost. We measured the expression levels of MMPs and TIMPs using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and compared the results. Enzyme activities of MMP-2 and 9 in conditioned media were measured by gelatin zymography. Results: All prostaglandin analogs we examined dose-dependently increased expression levels of MMP-1, -2, -3, -9, and -17, whereas expression levels of TIMP-1 and -2 decreased with increasing concentrations of each analog. Each prostaglandin analog induced different levels of increases in MMPs and decreases in TIMPs. Conclusions: Unique expression profiles of MMPs and TIMPs induced by bimatoprost, latanoprost, and tafluprost, as shown in HNPCECs, may contribute to clinically different effects on intraocular pressure decreases in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据