4.2 Article

Sharp minimax tests for large covariance matrices and adaptation

期刊

ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 1927-1972

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/16-EJS1143

关键词

adaptive test; covariance matrix; goodness-of-fit tests; high-dimensional data; minimax separation rate; sharp asymptotic rate; U-statistic

资金

  1. [ANR-12-MONU-0003 DIONISOS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider the detection problem of correlations in a p-dimensional Gaussian vector, when we observe n independent, identically distributed random vectors, for n and p large. We assume that the covariance matrix varies in some ellipsoid with parameter alpha > 1/2 and total energy bounded by L > 0. We propose a test procedure based on a U-statistic of order 2 which is weighted in an optimal way. The weights are the solution of an optimization problem, they are constant on each diagonal and non-null only for the T first diagonals, where T = o(p). We show that this test statistic is asymptotically Gaussian distributed under the null hypothesis and also under the alternative hypothesis for matrices close to the detection boundary. We prove upper bounds for the total error probability of our test procedure, for alpha > 1/2 and under the assumption T = o(p) which implies that n = o(p(2 alpha)). We illustrate via a numerical study the behavior of our test procedure. Moreover, we prove lower bounds for the maximal type II error and the total error probabilities. Thus we obtain the asymptotic and the sharp asymptotically minimax separation rate (phi) over tilde = (C(alpha, L)n(2)p)(-alpha/(4 alpha+ 1)), for alpha > 3/2 and for alpha > 1 together with the additional assumption p = o(n(4 alpha-1)), respectively. We deduce rate asymptotic minimax results for testing the inverse of the covariance matrix. We construct an adaptive test procedure with respect to the parameter a and show that it attains the rate (psi) over tilde = (n(2)p/ln ln(n root p))(-alpha/(4 alpha+ 1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据