4.5 Article

Biomarker and competing endogenous RNA potential of tumor-specific long noncoding RNA in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 6399-6406

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S116392

关键词

long noncoding RNA; chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; biomarker; competing endogenous RNA network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571443]
  2. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department [20140414031GH, 20150101121JC]
  3. Health and Family Planning Commission of Jilin Province [2014Z068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the initiation and progression of cancers. However, their functions in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) are not fully understood. Methods: We analyzed the expression profiles of lncRNA, microRNA, and protein-coding RNA, along with the clinical information of 59 primary chRCC patients collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas database to identify lncRNA biomarkers for prognosis. We also constructed an lncRNA-microRNA-mRNA coexpression network (competitive endogenous RNAs network) by bioinformational approach. Results: One hundred and forty-two lncRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the cancer and normal tissues (fold change >= 1.5, P<0.001). Among them, 12 lncRNAs were also differentially expressed with the corresponding clinical characteristics (fold change >= 1.5, P<0.01). Besides, 7 lncRNAs (COL18A1-AS, BRE-AS1, SNHG7, TMEM51-AS1, C21orf62-AS1, LINC00336, and LINC00882) were identified to be significantly correlated with overall survival (log-rank P<0.05). A competitive endogenous RNA network in chRCC containing 16 lncRNAs, 18 miRNAs, and 168 protein-coding RNAs was constructed. Conclusion: Our results identified specific lncRNAs associated with chRCC progression and prognosis, and presented competing endogenous RNA potential of lncRNAs in the tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据