4.5 Article

BC200 LncRNA a potential predictive marker of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

期刊

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 2221-2226

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S99401

关键词

BC200; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; predictive marker; poor prognosis; long noncoding RNAs

资金

  1. First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University for Young Scientists
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472714/H1606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the expression and prognosis significance of BC200 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received radical resection. Methods: We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect the expression level of BC200 in cancer tissue and paired adjacent normal tissue samples from 70 ESCC patients who received radical surgical resection and analyzed the correlation of the relative expression level of BC200 with clinical-pathological features and prognosis. Results: We found that the relative expression of BC200 was significantly higher in ESCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissue samples (P=0.023). But the expression of BC200 were not related to clinical-pathological features, such as age, TNM stages, and histological grade (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high expression levels of BC200 were correlated with poor prognosis in ESCC patients. Patients with a high level of BC200 had a shorter disease-free survival and overall survival than those with low BC200 expression (P=0.034 and P=0.031, respectively). On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of BC200 expression was 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-4.19, P=0.022) for disease-free survival and 2.24 (95% CI=1.12-4.49, P=0.023) for overall survival. Conclusion: Our results indicate that high expression of BC200 reflects poor prognosis and could serve as a novel predictive marker for ESCC patients who received radical resection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据