4.4 Article

Gypsum amendment to rice paddy soil stimulated bacteria involved in sulfur cycling but largely preserved the phylogenetic composition of the total bacterial community

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 413-423

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12413

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [PE 2147/1-1]
  2. European Union [PCIG14-GA-2013-630188, GA 229802]
  3. European Union (WETLA-NET)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23117-B17]
  5. LOEWE Center for Synthetic Microbiology
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23117] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice paddies are indispensable for human food supply but emit large amounts of the greenhouse gas methane. Sulfur cycling occurs at high rates in these water-submerged soils and controls methane production, an effect that is increased by sulfate-containing fertilizers or soil amendments. We grew rice plants until their late vegetative phase with and without gypsum (CaSO4 center dot 2H(2)O) amendment and identified responsive bacteria by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Gypsum amendment decreased methane emissions by up to 99% but had no major impact on the general phylogenetic composition of the bacterial community. It rather selectively stimulated or repressed a small number of 129 and 27 species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (out of 1883-2287 observed) in the rhizosphere and bulk soil, respectively. Gypsum-stimulated OTUs were affiliated with several potential sulfate-reducing (Syntrophobacter, Desulfovibrio, unclassified Desulfobulbaceae, unclassified Desulfobacteraceae) and sulfur-oxidizing taxa (Thiobacillus, unclassified Rhodocyclaceae), while gypsum-repressed OTUs were dominated by aerobic methanotrophs (Methylococcaceae). Abundance correlation networks suggested that two abundant (>1%) OTUs (Desulfobulbaceae, Rhodocyclaceae) were central to the reductive and oxidative parts of the sulfur cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据