4.8 Article

Controlling amphiphilic copolymer self-assembly morphologies based on macrocycle/anion recognition and nucleotide-induced payload release

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 6006-6014

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc01851c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB834502]
  2. NSFC/China [21434005, 91527301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. US National Institutes of Health [GM103790]
  5. Robert A. Welch Foundation
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM103790] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here a new approach for creating diversiform copolymer-derived self-assembly morphologies that relies on macrocycle/anion recognition in aqueous media. This approach exploits the anion binding features of a water-soluble form of the so-called 'Texas-sized' molecular box. When this tetracationic receptor is added to an aqueous solution of an amphiphilic copolymer bearing tethered carboxylate anion substituents, binding occurs to form a macrocycle/polymer complex. As the concentration of the box-like receptor increases, the relative hydrophilic fraction of the copolymer complex likewise increases. This leads to changes in the overall morphology of the self-assembled ensemble. The net result is an environmentally controllable system that mimics on a proof-of-concept level the structural evolution of organelles seen in living cells. The macrocycle/anion interactions respond in differing degrees to three key biological species, namely ATP, ADP, and AMP, which may be used as inputs to induce disassembly of these vehicles. As a result of this triggering and the nature of the morphological changes induced, the present copolymer system is capable of capturing and releasing in a controlled manner various test payloads, including hydrophobic and hydrophilic fluorophores. The copolymer displays a low inherent cytotoxicity as inferred from cell proliferation assays involving the HUVEC and HepG2 cell lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据