4.8 Article

Reductively PEGylated carbon nanomaterials and their use to nucleate 3D protein crystals: a comparison of dimensionality

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 2916-2923

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03595c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISSF): Networks of Excellence Award [RSRO P41619]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K016792/1, EP/L001896/1, EP/K039946/1, EP/G007314/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039946/1, 1138467, EP/L001896/1, EP/K016792/1, EP/G007314/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A range of carbon nanomaterials, with varying dimensionality, were dispersed by a non-damaging and versatile chemical reduction route, and subsequently grafted by reaction with methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG) monobromides. The use of carbon nanomaterials with different geometries provides both a systematic comparison of surface modification chemistry and the opportunity to study factors affecting specific applications. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes, single-walled carbon nanotubes, graphite nanoplatelets, exfoliated few layer graphite and carbon black were functionalized with mPEG-Br, yielding grafting ratios relative to the nanocarbon framework between ca. 7 and 135 wt%; the products were characterised by Raman spectroscopy, TGA-MS, and electron microscopy. The functionalized materials were tested as nucleants by subjecting them to rigorous protein crystallization studies. Sparsely functionalized flat sheet geometries proved exceptionally effective at inducing crystallization of six proteins. This new class of nucleant, based on PEG grafted graphene-related materials, can be widely applied to promote the growth of 3D crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography. The association of the protein ferritin with functionalized exfoliated few layer graphite was directly visualized by transmission electron microscopy, illustrating the formation of ordered clusters of protein molecules critical to successful nucleation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据