4.8 Article

Study of double core hole excitations in molecules by X-ray double-quantum-coherence signals: a multi-configuration simulation

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 5922-5933

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc01571a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-4ER15571]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1361516]
  3. DOE grant at UCI
  4. Freiburg Institite of Advanced Science (FRIAS)
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW-2013.0020]
  6. Goran Gustafsson Foundation for Research in Natural Sciences and Medicine
  7. Hefei Science Center CAS [2015HSC-UE008]
  8. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The multi-configurational self-consistent field method is employed to simulate the two-dimensional all-X-ray double-quantum-coherence (XDQC) spectroscopy, a four-wave mixing signal that provides direct signatures of double core hole (DCH) states. The valence electronic structure is probed by capturing the correlation between the single (SCH) and double core hole states. The state-averaged restricted-activespace self-consistent field (SA-RASSCF) approach is used which can treat the valence, SCH, and DCH states at the same theoretical level, and applies to all types of DCHs (located on one or two atoms, K-edge or L-edge), with both accuracy and efficiency. Orbital relaxation introduced by the core hole(s) and the static electron correlation is properly accounted for. The XDQC process can take place via different intermediate DCH state channels by tuning the pulse frequencies. We simulate the XDQC signals for the three isomers of aminophenol at 8 pulse frequency configurations, covering all DCH pathways involving the N1s and O1s core hole (N1sN1s, O1sO1s and N1sO1s), which reveal different patterns of valence excitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据