Thresholds for Arterial Wall Inflammation Quantified by 18F-FDG PET Imaging

OBJECTIVES This study, assessed 5 frequently applied arterial (18)fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) uptake metrics in healthy control subjects, those with risk factors and patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), to derive uptake thresholds in each subject group. Additionally, we tested the reproducibility of these measures and produced recommended sample sizes for interventional drug studies. BACKGROUND F-18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) can identify plaque inflammation as a surrogate endpoint for vascular interventional drug trials. However, an overview of F-18-FDG uptake metrics, threshold values, and reproducibility in healthy compared with diseased subjects is not available. METHODS F-18-FDG PET/CT of the carotid arteries and ascending aorta was performed in 83 subjects (61 +/- 8 years) comprising 3 groups: 25 healthy controls, 23 patients at increased CVD risk, and 35 patients with known CVD. We quantified F-18-FDG uptake across the whole artery, the most-diseased segment, and within all active segments over several pre-defined cutoffs. We report these data with and without background corrections. Finally, we determined measurement reproducibility and recommended sample sizes for future drug studies based on these results. RESULTS All F-18-FDG uptake metrics were significantly different between healthy and diseased subjects for both the carotids and aorta. Thresholds of physiological F-18-FDG uptake were derived from healthy controls using the 90th percentile of their target to background ratio (TBR) value (TBRmax); whole artery TBRmax is 1.84 for the carotids and 2.68 in the aorta. These were exceeded by >52% of risk factor patients and >67% of CVD patients. Reproducibility was excellent in all study groups (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.95). Using carotid TBRmax as a primary endpoint resulted in sample size estimates approximately 20% Lower than aorta. CONCLUSIONS We report thresholds for physiological F-18-FDG uptake in the arterial wall in healthy subjects, which are exceeded by the majority of CVD patients. This remains true, independent of readout vessel, signal quantification method, or the use of background correction. We also confirm the high reproducibility of F-18-FDG PET measures of inflammation. Nevertheless, because of overlap between subject categories and the relatively small population studied, these data have Limited generalizability until substantiated in Larger, prospective event-driven studies. (Vascular Inflammation in Patients at Risk for Atherosclerotic Disease; NTR5006) (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier.