4.4 Article

On the natures of the spin and orbital parts of optical angular momentum

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPTICS
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/18/6/064004

关键词

optical angular momentum; spin angular momentum; orbital angular momentum; helicity

类别

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/I01245/1, EP/M004694/1, EP/M01326X/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/M01326X/1, EP/M004694/1, EP/I012451/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I012451/1, EP/M004694/1, EP/M01326X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modern field of optical angular momentum began with the realisation by Allen et al in 1992 that, in addition to the spin associated with polarisation, light beams with helical phase fronts carry orbital angular momentum. There has been much confusion and debate, however, surrounding the intricacies of the field and, in particular, the separation of the angular momentum into its spin and orbital parts. Here we take the opportunity to state the current position as we understand it, which we present as six perspectives: (i) we start with a reprise of the 1992 paper in which it was pointed out that the Laguerre-Gaussian modes, familiar from laser physics, carry orbital angular momentum. (ii) The total angular momentum may be separated into spin and orbital parts, but neither alone is a true angular momentum. (iii) The spin and orbital parts, although not themselves true angular momenta, are distinct and physically meaningful, as has been demonstrated clearly in a range of experiments. (iv) The orbital part of the angular momentum in the direction of propagation of a beam is not simply the azimuthal component of the linear momentum. (v) The component of spin in the direction of propagation is not the helicity, although these are related quantities. (vi) Finally, the spin and orbital parts of the angular momentum correspond to distinct symmetries of the free electromagnetic field and hence are separately conserved quantities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据