4.7 Article

DEM simulations of sandstone under true triaxial compressive tests

期刊

ACTA GEOTECHNICA
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 495-510

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0480-6

关键词

Discrete element method; Micro-mechanisms; Porous sandstone; True triaxial test

资金

  1. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Z014004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51428902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerically simulated true triaxial compression tests (sigma(1) >= sigma(2) >= sigma(3)) are conducted in this study to elucidate the failure mechanism of sandstone using 3D discrete element method (DEM), in particular the effect of the intermediate principal stress (sigma(2)). Eight series of tests (sigma(3) = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 100 MPa) are conducted. Within each series, sigma(2) is varied from sigma(2) = sigma(3) to sigma(2) = sigma(1) from test to test. For each test, sigma(1) is raised monotonically to failure while keeping sigma(2) and sigma(3) constant. The DEM simulations reveal the effect of sigma(2) on the variations of peak stress, Young's modulus, failure plane angles, the brittle-ductile transition, and the evolution of failure modes, the effect beyond the well-understood effect of sigma(3). The simulation is in qualitative agreement with the results obtained experimentally. Detailed analyses performed on the particle-scale responses further the understanding of the microscopic mechanisms. The distribution of contact force becomes more homogeneous with the increase of sigma(3), which leads to the resulting damage being more localized rather than diffused. The interaction between contact force distribution and coalescence of cracks determines the processes and patterns of fracturing in the sample scale. sigma(2) is found to affect the microscopic stress distribution as well as structure evolution, and this effect weakens with the increase of sigma(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据