4.3 Article

Revision of the Old World Daphnia (Ctenodaphnia) similis group (Cladocera: Daphniidae)

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 4161, 期 1, 页码 1-40

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.1.1

关键词

Daphnia; taxonomy; Crustacea; Anomopoda; new species; distribution

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) - Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea [NIBR201501201]
  2. VLIR, Belgium
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-04-01149-a]
  4. US National Science Foundation grant [ARC 1023334]
  5. Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1023334] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species of the genus Daphnia O.F. Muller, 1785 (Cladocera: Daphniidae) have become very important models in evolutionary biology research. Previous morphological and genetic evidence suggests that numerous closely related species groups exist within the subgenus Daphnia (Ctenodaphnia) Dybowski & Grochowski, 1895, containing both described and undescribed species. The Daphnia similis group is among these species groups. The aim of the present paper is to revise the taxonomy of the Daphnia (Ctenodaphnia) similis group in the Old World with both morphological and genetic evidence (based on mitochondrial COI and 12S rRNA genes). We found that there are at least four species in the Old World D. similis species group: D. similis Claus, 1876; D. sinensis Gu, Xu, Li, Dumont et Han, 2013; D. similoides Hudec, 1991 and D. inopinata sp. nov. These four taxa of the similis-group, confused previously with D. similis, have different distributional ranges in the Old World, from extremely wide, spanning several biogegraphic regions (as D. sinensis), to regional endemics (D. similoides) and even species known so far from a single locality (D. inopinata sp. nov.). The Daphnia similis group provides another example in the cladocerans whereby the study of males yields more valuable characters for taxonomy than the study of parthenogenetic females.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据