4.5 Article

Revision of the Triassic European turtles Proterochersis and Murrhardtia (Reptilia, Testudinata, Proterochersidae), with the description of new taxa from Poland and Germany

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 177, 期 2, 页码 395-427

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12374

关键词

Lowenstein Formation; Norian; origin of turtles; Stubensandstein; Upper Triassic; vertebrate phylogeny; Zbaszynek Beds

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recently discovered Norian outcrop in Poreba, Poland, has yielded numerous well-preserved turtle remains. These, together with historical materials from Germany, enabled the identification of two new proterochersid taxa: Proterochersis porebensis sp. nov. from Poland and Keuperotesta limendorsa gen. et sp. nov. from Germany. Moreover, two problematic taxa, Proterochersis intermedia Fraas, 1913; and Murrhardtia staeschei Karl & Tichy, 2000; are shown to be conspecific with Proterochersis robusta Fraas, 1913. New diagnoses for the family Proterochersidae Nopcsa, 1923 and all included taxa are provided. Proterochersids are of great importance to turtle phylogeny because of their age (they comprise the oldest fully shelled turtle species known to date) and their still-debated phylogenetic position (classically they are considered the basalmost Pleurodira, but in some analyses they are placed on the stem of Testudinata). Newly discovered plesiomorphic aspects of the anatomy of these three species included in the phylogenetic analysis demonstrate that they are not only the oldest, but are also the most basal fully shelled turtles. The unique features of their shell (e.g. the first thoracic rib unreduced and costal-bearing, and the osseous contact between the carapace and sacral vertebra) are of special significance for future research of the earliest stages of turtle shell evolution. This is the first contribution focused solely on the new, phylogenetically informative, and important characters of this group since the initial description of P. robusta more than 100 years ago. (C) 2016 The Linnean Society of London

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据