4.5 Article

Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments

期刊

WORLD PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 276-286

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wps.20349

关键词

Community mental health care; mental health services; low- and middle-income countries; evidence-based interventions; schools; workplace; chronic care model; deinstitutionalization

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London Foundation Trust
  2. UK Department of Health via the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit
  3. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Emerald project
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2014-17-006, NF-SI-0611-10053] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to give an overview of the key issues facing those who are in a position to influence the planning and provision of mental health systems, and who need to address questions of which staff, services and sectors to invest in, and for which patients. The paper considers in turn: a) definitions of community mental health care; b) a conceptual framework to use when evaluating the need for hospital and community mental health care; c) the potential for wider platforms, outside the health service, for mental health improvement, including schools and the workplace; d) data on how far community mental health services have been developed across different regions of the world; e) the need to develop in more detail models of community mental health services for low- and middle-income countries which are directly based upon evidence for those countries; f) how to incorporate mental health practice within integrated models to identify and treat people with comorbid long-term conditions; g) possible adverse effects of deinstitutionalization. We then present a series of ten recommendations for the future strengthening of health systems to support and treat people with mental illness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据