4.5 Article

Optimised photodynamic diagnosis for transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) in German clinical practice: results of the noninterventional study OPTIC III

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 737-744

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1925-0

关键词

Blue light cystoscopy; Hexaminolevulinate; Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; Observational studies; White light cystoscopy

资金

  1. Ipsen Pharma, Germany
  2. Ipsen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White light cystoscopy (WLC) is the standard procedure for visualising non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, WLC can fail to detect all cancerous lesions, and outcomes with transurethral resection of the bladder differ between institutions, controlled trials, and possibly between trials and routine application. This noninterventional study assessed the benefit of hexaminolevulinate blue light cystoscopy (HALC; Hexvix(A (R)), Ipsen Pharma GmbH, Germany) plus WLC versus WLC alone in routine use. From May 2013 to April 2014, 403 patients with suspected NMIBC were screened from 30 German centres to perform an unprecedented detailed assessment of the additional detection of cancer lesions with HALC versus WLC alone. Among the histological results for 929 biopsy samples, 94.3 % were obtained from suspected cancerous lesions under either WLC or HALC: 59.5 % were carcinoma tissue and 40.5 % were non-cancerous tissue. Of all cancer lesions, 62.2 % were staged as Ta, 20.1 % as T1, 9.3 % as T2, 7.3 % as carcinoma in situ (CIS), and 1.2 % were unknown. Additional cancer lesions (+6.8 %) and CIS lesions (+25 %, p < 0.0001) were detected by HALC plus WLC versus WLC alone. In 10.0 % of patients, ae1 additional positive lesion was detected with HALC, and 2.2 % of NMIBC patients would have been missed with WLC alone. No adverse events were observed. The results of this study demonstrate that HALC significantly improves the detection of NMIBC versus WLC alone in routine clinical practice in Germany. While this benefit is statistically significant across all types of NMIBC, it seems most relevant in CIS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据