4.7 Article

The DNA methylation signature of human TCRαβ+CD4-CD8-double negative T cells reveals CG demethylation and a unique epigenetic architecture permissive to a broad stimulatory immune response

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 156, 期 1, 页码 19-27

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.10.007

关键词

Double negative; T cell; Epigenome; Methylome; DNA methylation

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01AI097134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T cell receptor (TCR) alpha beta+CD4-CD8- double negative T cells represent a rare T cell subset implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases. We investigated the DNA methylation signature of double negative T cells to gain insight into the epigenetic architecture of peripheral blood primary human double negative T cells compared to autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We identified 2984 CG sites across the genome with unique loss of DNA methylation in double negative T cells, and showed significant reduction in mRNA expression of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B. DNA methylation was increased in CD8A/CD8B and CD4 consistent with epigenetic repression of both the CD8 and CD4 genetic loci in double negative T cells. We show a consistent increase in non-CG methylation in double negative T cells, a finding suggestive of pluripotency. Network analyses indicate a strong relationship between double negative T cells and functions related to cell-cell interaction, cell adhesion, and cell activation pathways. Our data also suggest a robust pro-inflammatory epigenetic signature in double negative T cells, consistent with a transcriptional permissiveness in key inflammatory cytokines including IFN-gamma, IL-17F, IL-12B, IL-5, IL-18, TNFSF11 (RANKL), and TNFSF13B (BLYS or BAFF). These findings highlight an epigenetic basis for a role of double negative T cells in autoimmunity. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据