4.1 Article

Assessment of water quality based on diatom indices in a small temperate river system, Kowie River, South Africa

期刊

WATER SA
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 183-193

出版社

WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v42i2.02

关键词

biomonitoring; diatom indices; diatom community; Kowie River; nitrogen; multivariate analysis; point-source pollution; water quality

资金

  1. Water Research Commission
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. Rhodes University Sandisa Imbewu Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the impact of land use patterns on water quality and benthic diatom community structure and to test the applicability of diatom indices developed in other regions of the world to a small temperate southern African river system. Sampling was conducted at eight study sites along the length of the river on four separate occasions. Multivariate data analyses were performed on the diatom community dataset to specify the main gradients of floristic variation and to detect and visualize similarities in diatom samples in relation to land-use patterns within the catchment. One hundred and twelve (112) diatom species belonging to 36 genera were recorded during the study. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) demonstrated that variations in the benthic diatom community structure were best explained by ammonium, nitrate, conductivity, pH, temperature, resistivity and water flow. OMNIDIA was used for calculation of selected diatom water quality indices. A number of the indices, e.g., the trophic diatom index (TDI), eutrophication/pollution index and biological index of water quality (BIWQ), either under-or over-estimated the water quality of the system. With few exceptions, there were no significant correlations (p>0.05) between the diatom indices' values and the nutrient variables. The absence of any significant correlations between the diatom indices' values and selected physico-chemical variables suggests that indices developed in other regions of the world may not be suitable for temperate southern African rivers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据