4.8 Article

A model for methane production in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 464-474

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.060

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Swine wastewater; Model; Volumetric methane production rate

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31572450]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-36-10B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted using a laboratory-scale anaerobic sequencing batch digester to investigate the quantitative influence of organic loading rates (OLRs) on the methane production rate during digestion of swine wastewater at temperatures between 15 degrees C and 35 degrees C. The volumetric production rate of methane (R-p) at different OLRs and temperatures was obtained. The maximum volumetric methane production rates (R-pmax) were 0.136, 0.796, 1.294, 1.527 and 1.952 L-CH4 L-1 d(-1) at corresponding organic loading rates of 1.2, 3.6, 5.6, 5.6 and 7.2 g volatile solids L-1 d(-1), respectively, which occurred at 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 degrees C, respectively. A new model was developed to describe the quantitative relationship between R-p and OLR. In addition to the maximum volumetric methane production rate (R-pmax) and the half-saturation constant (K-LR) commonly used in previous models such as the modified Stover Kincannon model and Deng model, the new model introduced a new index (K-D) that denoted the speed of volumetric methane production rate approaching the maximum as a function of temperature. The new model more satisfactorily described the influence of OLR on the rate of methane production than other models as confirmed by higher determination coefficients (R-2) (0.9717-0.9900) and lower bias between the experimental and predicted data in terms of the root mean square error and the Akaike Information Criterion. Data from other published research also validated the applicability and generality of the new kinetic model to different types of wastewater. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据