4.3 Review

Hypoxia and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: A Tale With Many Endings

期刊

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 295-301

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.03.006

关键词

Carbonic anhydrase; Hypoxia; Hypoxia-inducible factor 1; Lysyl oxidase; Prostate cancer; Vascular endothelial growth factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis, increased glycolysis, and cellular adaptation to hypoxic microenvironment are characteristic of solid tumors, including prostate cancer. These representative features are the cornerstone of cancer biology, which are well correlated with invasion, metastasis, and lethality, as well as likely with the success of prostate cancer treatment (eg, tumor hypoxia has been associated with resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy). It is well established that prostate cancer cells also metabolically depend on enhanced glucose transport and glycolysis for expansion, whereas growth is contingent with neovascularization to permit diffusion of oxygen and glucose. While hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) remains the central player, the succeeding activated molecules and pathways track distinct branches, all positively correlated with the degree of intratumoral hypoxia. Among these, the vascular endothelial growth factor axis as well as the lysyl oxidase and carbonic anhydrase IX activities are notable in prostate cancer and merit further study. Here, we demonstrate their linkage with HIF-1 alpha as a tentative explanatory mechanism of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Hypoxia drives a tale where HIF-1 alpha-dependent effects lead to many influences in distinct key cancer biology features, rendering targeted therapies toward targets at the endings less efficient. The most appropriate approach will be to inhibit the upstream common driver (HIF-1 alpha) activity. Additional translational and clinical research initiatives in prostate cancer are required to prove its usefulness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据