4.5 Article

Tissue tropism and molecular characterization of a Japanese encephalitis virus strain isolated from pigs in southwest China

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 55-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.02.001

关键词

Japanese encephalitis virus; Isolate; Tissue tropism; Molecular characterization

类别

资金

  1. Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203082]
  2. Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan in China [2013SZ0068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since September 2012, an epidemic has been spreading among swine in a pig farm located in Sichuan province, southwest China, which has resulted in abortion, stillbirth, and fetal mummification. The brains of stillborn pigs were collected and a previously unknown Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), namely SCYA201201, was isolated. According to the results of agarose gel diffusion precipitation, indirect immunofluorescence analysis, neutralization testing, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) amplification, and physical and chemical testing, the virus was conformed to have the characteristics of JEV. The virus titer in BHK-21 cells was 10(8.47) PFU/ml and the median lethal dose (LD50) to 3 -week-old and 7-day-old mice was 1.99 log10 and 1.02 log10 PFU/LD50, respectively. The results of tissue tropism for mice showed that the viral load in the brain was significantly higher than other organs, indicating that the isolate was strongly neurotropic. Additionally, the complete genome sequence of the isolate was determined and compared with other JEV strains. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolate belongs to genotype I and may be an imported virus. The isolate had 88.4% nucleotide identity with the Chinese vaccine strain SA14-14-2. However, there were 69 amino acid substitutions compared with the strain SA14-14-2. Some substitutions indicated that SCYA201201 was highly neurovirulent and infective, in accordance with the results of animal testing. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据