4.7 Article

Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Epidemiology to Prevention: Translating Knowledge into Practice

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 2140-2151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.014

关键词

Chemoprevention; Surveillance; Cirrhosis; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis B; NAFLD

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas Multi-Investigator Research Award [RP150587]
  2. Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence [HFP90-020]
  3. Texas Digestive Disease Center National Institutes of Health [DK58338]
  4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K24-04-107]
  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research [R24 HS022418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by dynamic temporal trends, several major established (i.e., HCV, HBV, alcohol) and emerging (i.e., diabetes, obesity, NAFLD) risk factors. Epidemiologic studies and clinical trials have identified additional demographic, clinical, pharmacological, genetic and life style factors that further affect or modify the likelihood of HCC and can be used in clinical practice to identify at-risk patients (i.e., risk stratification or prognostic algorithms) that can be targeted for prevention and early detection programs. These studies have also paved the way toward several well established preventive measures including HBV vaccination, HBV treatment, HCV treatment and HCC surveillance, and potential chemoprevention using statins, metformin or coffee. However, the effectiveness of HCC prevention in clinical practice and at the population level has lagged behind due to patient, provider, system, and societal factors. The Quality in the Continuum of Cancer Care model provides a framework for evaluating the HCC prevention processes, including potential failures that create a gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据