4.7 Article

The functions of the variable lipoprotein family of Mycoplasma hyorhinis in adherence to host cells

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 82-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.017

关键词

Adhesion; Mycoplasma hyorhinis; Variable lipoprotein

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300155]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130702]
  3. Special Fund for Independent Innovation of Agricultural Science and Technology in Jiangsu Province of China [CX(14)5039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycoplasma hyorhinis (M. hyorhinis) is a swine pathogen that is associated with various human cancers and contamination in cell cultures. However, no studies on the adhesion molecules of this pathogen have yet been reported. The variable lipoprotein (Vlp) family is an important surface component of M. hyorhinis. Herein, we performed several experiments to identify the function of the Vlp family in adherence to host cells. Seven recombinant Vlp (rVlp) proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity chromatography. The potential role of rVlp adherence to pig kidney (PK-15) and swine tracheal epithelial (STEC) cells was then studied by indirect immunofluorescence assay and microtiter plate adherence assay. Adhesion of M. hyorhinis to PK-15 and STEC cells was specifically inhibited by the addition of a cocktail of rVIp proteins. The rVlp protein mixture was shown to bind to both PK-15 and STEC cells. The binding increased in a dose-dependent manner and could be blocked by antisera against the rVlp proteins. Most of the rVlp proteins could bind individually to both PK-15 and STEC cells except for rVlpD and rVlpF, which bound only to STEC cells. Because Vlp members vary in size among different strains and generations, they may vary in their cytoadhesion capabilities in various strains. In summary, the present results indicate that the Vlp family functions as adhesins of M. hyorhinis. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据