4.4 Article

Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and psychiatric disorders: cross-sectional results from the Brazilian Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil)

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 84, 期 2, 页码 250-256

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12719

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brazilian Ministry of Health (Science and Technology Department)
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology
  3. CNPq - National Research Council [01 06 0010.00 RS, 01 06 0212.00 BA, 01 06 0300.00 ES, 01 06 0278.00 MG, 01 06 0115.00 SP, 01 06 0071.00 RJ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the association between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and psychiatric disorders using baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Design Cross-sectional study. Patients The study included 12 437 participants from the ELSA-Brasil with normal thyroid function (92.8%), 193 (1.4%) with subclinical hyperthyroidism and 784 (5.8%) with subclinical hypothyroidism, totalling 13 414 participants (50.6% of women). Measurements The mental health diagnoses of participants were assessed by trained raters using the Clinical Interview Schedule - Revised (CIS-R) and grouped according to the International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10). Thyroid dysfunction was assessed using TSH and FT4 as well as routine use of thyroid hormones or antithyroid medications. Logistic models were presented using psychiatric disorders as the dependent variable and subclinical thyroid disorders as the independent variable. All logistic models were corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Results After multivariate adjustment for possible confounders, we found a direct association between subclinical hyperthyroidism and panic disorder odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence Interval (95% CI), 1.09-5.94; and an inverse association between subclinical hypothyroidism and generalized anxiety disorder (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96). However, both lost significance after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion Subclinical hyperthyroidism was positively associated with panic disorder and negatively associated with anxiety disorder, although not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据