4.1 Article

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy and Urodynamic Findings of Solifenacin Succinate versus Mirabegron in Women with Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study

期刊

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 325-329

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000445808

关键词

Overactive bladder syndrome; Antimuscarinic; Urodynamic study; Solifenacin; Mirabegron

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: We assessed clinical and urodynamic effects of solifenacin versus mirabegron in women with overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. Material and Methods: Eighty women with OAB were randomized into 2 groups. In group A, the patients received solifenacin 5 mg once a day for 12 weeks; in group B, the patients received mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 12 weeks. Symptoms were assessed with OAB Symptom Score (OABSS). Patients underwent urodynamic investigation with pressure flow study. OABSS and urodynamic study were performed before and after treatment. Results: Both solifenacin and mirabegron were effective in improving OAB symptoms. Mirabegron showed greater tolerability with fewer patients discontinuing therapy because of side effects. Both solifenacin and mirabegron were effective in improving the storage function in the pressure flow study, but solifenacin showed a significant reduction of the detrusor pressure in the voiding phase with an increase in the postvoid residual urine volume. Conclusions: Mirabegron has shown to be a drug with the better balance between efficacy and tolerability in women with OAB. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据