4.7 Article

Effects of VOCs from leaves of Acer truncatum Bunge and Cedrus deodara on human physiology and psychology

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 29-34

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.021

关键词

Acer truncatum bunge; Cedrus deodara; Electrocardiogram (ECG); Indicators; Semantic differential method (SD); Volatile compounds (VOCs)

资金

  1. National Twelfth Five-year Plan special fund for industry public welfare [20140430108]
  2. national natural science foundation of China [31170662, 31300591]
  3. postdoctoral fund of Shandong agricultural university [76362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of volatile compounds emitted by Acer truncatum Bunge and Cedrus deodara on human physiology and psychology. Volatile compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques. Physiological indicators were measured using a multi-channel recording system and a subjective evaluation was conducted using a semantic differential (SD) questionnaire. GC-MS results indicated that the main volatile compounds of A. truncatum Bunge included 3-hexen-1-ol acetate, 3-hexen-1-ol, acetic acid hexyl ester, and the main volatile compounds from C. deodara included beta-myrcene, D-limonene, pinene and beta-caryophyllene. Physiological results indicated that blood oxygen saturation (BOS) increased 0.42%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) all reduced, heart rate reduced 5.03%, and the interval of R wave and R wave (RR interval) shortened 5.07% after sniffing volatile compounds from C. deodara. These indicators were not significantly different from controls after sniffing volatile compounds from Acer truncatum. Nearly 50% of respondents reported liking the smell of A. truncatum Bunge and C deodara, and associated the smell with a natural feeling. Subjects also reported that the smell of C deodara (relaxing 0.96) made them more relaxed than A. truncatum Bunge (relaxing 0.34). (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据