4.6 Article

Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 333-339

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.15884

关键词

consensus; definition; Delphi; fetal growth restriction; placenta; placenta-based FGR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine, by expert consensus, a definition for early and late fetal growth restriction (FGR) through a Delphi procedure. Method A Delphi survey was conducted among an international panel of experts on FGR. Panel members were provided with 18 literature-based parameters for defining FGR and were asked to rate the importance of these parameters for the diagnosis of both early and late FGR on a 5-point Likert scale. Parameters were described as solitary parameters (parameters that are sufficient to diagnose FGR, even if all other parameters are normal) and contributory parameters (parameters that require other abnormal parameter(s) to be present for the diagnosis of FGR). Consensus was sought to determine the cut-off values for accepted parameters. Results A total of 106 experts were approached, of whom 56 agreed to participate and entered the first round, and 45 (80%) completed all four rounds. For early FGR (<32 weeks), three solitary parameters (abdominal circumference (AC) <3rd centile, estimated fetal weight (EFW)<3rd centile and absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery (UA)) and four contributory parameters (AC or EFW <10th centile combined with a pulsatility index (PI)>95th centile in either the UA or uterine artery) were agreed upon. For late FGR (>= 32 weeks), two solitary parameters (AC or EFW <3rd centile) and four contributory parameters (EFW or AC <10th centile, AC or EFW crossing centiles by >two quartiles on growth charts and cerebroplacental ratio <5th centile or UA-PI >95th centile) were defined. Conclusion Consensus-based definitions for early and late FGR, as well as cut-off values for parameters involved, were agreed upon by a panel of experts. Copyright (C) 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据