4.7 Article

Effects of power ultrasound on oxidation and structure of beef proteins during curing processing

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 47-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.04.024

关键词

Power ultrasound; Protein oxidation; Surface hydrophobicity; FTIR; Protein secondary structure

资金

  1. Twelfth Five Issues of Rural Areas of People's Republic of China [2014BAD04B11]
  2. Jiangsu postgraduate scientific research and innovation projects [KYLX15-0590]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of power ultrasound intensity (PUS, 2.39, 6.23,11.32 and 20.96 W cm(-2)) and treatment time (30, 60, 90 and 120 min) on the oxidation and structure of beef proteins during the brining procedure with 6% NaCl concentration. The investigation was conducted with an ultrasonic generator with the frequency of 20 kHz and fresh beef at 48 h after slaughter. Analysis of TBARS (Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) contents showed that PUS treatment significantly increased the extent of lipid oxidation compared to static brining (P < 0.05). As. indicators of protein oxidation, the carbonyl contents were significantly affected by PUS (P < 0.05). SDS-PAGE analysis showed that PUS treatment increased protein aggregation through disulfide cross-linking, indicated by the decreasing content of total sulfhydryl groups which would contribute to protein oxidation. In addition, changes in protein structure after PUS treatment are suggested by the increases in free sulfhydryl residues and protein surface hydrophobicity. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) provided further information about the changes in protein secondary structures with increases in B-sheet and decreases in alpha-helix contents after PUS processing. These results indicate that PUS leads to changes in structures and oxidation of beef proteins caused by mechanical effects of cavitation and the resultant generation of free radicals. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据