4.7 Article

Brain Tumor Mutations Detected in Cerebral Spinal Fluid

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 514-522

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.235457

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R21 CA193046] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [K08 NS091527] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Detecting tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the blood of brain tumor patients is challenging, presumably owing to the blood-brain barrier. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) may serve as an alternative liquid biopsy of brain tumors by enabling measurement of circulating DNA within CSF to characterize tumorspecific mutations. Many aspects about the characteristics and detectability of tumor mutations in CSF remain undetermined. METHODS: We used digital PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing to quantify tumor mutations in the cfDNA of CSF and plasma collected from 7 patients with solid brain tumors. Also, we applied cancer panel sequencing to globally characterize the somatic mutation profile from the CSF of 1 patient with suspected leptomeningeal disease. RESULTS: We detected tumor mutations in CSF samples from 6 of 7 patients with solid brain tumors. The concentration of the tumor mutant alleles varied widely between patients, from <5 to nearly 3000 copies/mL CSF. We identified 7 somatic mutations from the CSF of a patient with leptomeningeal disease by use of cancer panel sequencing, and the result was concordant with genetic testing on the primary tumor biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor mutations were detectable in cfDNA from the CSF of patients with different primary and metastatic brain tumors. We designed 2 strategies to characterize tumor mutations in CSF for potential clinical diagnosis: the targeted detection of known driver mutations to monitor brain metastasis and the global characterization of genomic aberrations to direct personalized cancer care. (C) 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据