4.4 Article

Compressed sensing electron tomography of needle-shaped biological specimens - Potential for improved reconstruction fidelity with reduced dose

期刊

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 230-238

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.021

关键词

Electron tomography; Isotropic resolution; Compressed sensing; Life science

资金

  1. European Union [312483-ESTEEM2]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [291522-3DIMAGE]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through Cluster of Excellence Engineering of Advanced Materials at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg [SPP 1570]
  4. ERC [259619 PHOTO]
  5. Research Training Group Disperse Systems for Electronic Applications (DFG GEPRIS) [GRK 1161]
  6. Clare College, University of Cambridge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron tomography is an invaluable method for 3D cellular imaging. The technique is, however, limited by the specimen geometry, with a loss of resolution due to a restricted tilt range, an increase in specimen thickness with tilt, and a resultant need for subjective and time-consuming manual segmentation. Here we show that 3D reconstructions of needle-shaped biological samples exhibit isotropic resolution, facilitating improved automated segmentation and feature detection. By using scanning transmission electron tomography, with small probe convergence angles, high spatial resolution is maintained over large depths of field and across the tilt range. Moreover, the application of compressed sensing methods to the needle data demonstrates how high fidelity reconstructions may be achieved with far fewer images (and thus greatly reduced dose) than needed by conventional methods. These findings open the door to high fidelity electron tomography over critically relevant length-scales, filling an important gap between existing 3D cellular imaging techniques. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据